The G20 is comprised of twenty of the wealthiest industrial nations in the world, so why are we footing the bill for their private conference, and the resultant mayhem, instead of them? Why are we left on the hook for over a billion dollars for a G20 meeting we didn't want here to begin with? They should have paid us a billion dollars, and even then it wouldn't have been worth it.
Do you recall what CTV reported the G20 would cost us on February 24th? They said it would cost $150 million, with $143 million paid by the federal government and $7 million paid by Toronto (because it's so beneficial to us). $130 million of that amount was earmarked for security. That was before certain unscrupulous parties figured that this open trough of money should be taken advantage of more thoroughly, ten times more thoroughly to be exact.
I guess a cynic would say that importing those agitators and paying them overtime really adds up these days.
Why wasn't the meeting held at Exhibition Place, which is already fenced in and far from businesses? The "Fake Lake" was located there. There is also a masonic shrine fountain located there, and about thirty pagan god statues to make them feel at home. The fountain features a dark angel on top of the globe, holding aloft laurel leaves, symbolizing the victory of the goddess over the world.
Why wasn't the G20 meeting held at a secure military base with runways, like Trenton? Why didn't they just have a teleconference for free? And why are these accursed meetings held so frequently in Ontario?
Stephen Harper certainly got "revenge" on Toronto voters for not being supportive to his government, if that was his intention.
Since when did peaceful protest, peaceful assembly, free speech, and walking down the street in Toronto become illegal? And since when did arresting citizens without formal charges, who have broken no law, are given no legal council, and are incarcerated indefinitely become legal in Toronto? Since never.
But I guess there's no point in spending over a billion dollars on security and building a FEMA camp without filling it up, is there? The theme of the summit was "Recovery and New Beginnings" (sounds like a euphemism for the "new world order").
The "Fake Lake" turned out to be a $57,000 movie screen of Muskoka, with a few chairs, a few canoes, and a masonic reflecting pool in front of it, in a "T" shape (T-square, Tau cross). For that price, they could have rented ten buses to Muskoka and let the reporters experience it firsthand.
The Tau cross symbolizes the worship of the Sumerian solar god Tammuz, the Egyptian mysteries, blood sacrifice, and the zodiac bull Taurus (Zeus, moloch, Wall Street, commerce).
What publicity did we get in return for our 23 million dollar G8/G20 International Media Centre? Well, a New York Times article did mention the "natural beauty of the Muskoka region". Then again, a Reuters reporter condemned the "fake lake". I guess nothing says "Canadian fiscal restraint" to the world like a 23 million dollar boondoggle. Notice the occult number 23.
Mark Holland remarked that "Instead of hosting world leaders, maybe the government should consider party planning for Lady Gaga".
Here is Stephen Harper at the G20 declaring that "there isn't really a Canadian economy anymore, only a global economy", in other words, "there isn't really a Canada anymore, only a new world order". He then laughs as he talks about Canada's "loss of national sovereignty":
Like Stephen Harper, and the masonic occult group Rush, says: "Each must play his part" (in the new world order).
Yes, we paid the G20 over a billion dollars to come to Toronto and plan how to destroy Canada. More money well-spent by the Harper government.
Hosting the G20 guests at the Metro Convention Centre did allow the guests to be near one of the tallest phallic obelisks in the world, that shrine to Ba'al/lucifer known as the CN Tower. After all, that is allegedly who most of the bigwigs worship and attain their power from.
It is right next to the female-anatomy structure, the former Skydome, which opens and closes. They copied the male Trylon (triangular pylon) and female Perisphere (surrounding sphere) of Edward Bernays' 1939 New York World's Fair.
What do obelisks have to do with politics and religion? There is a reason why the Washington Monument obelisk is right in front of the White House, folks. Read the book "Oval Office Occult" by Brian M. Thomsen if you don't know why. There is a reason that there is an Egyptian obelisk in the courtyard of the Vatican.
By the way, did anyone else notice the hidden meaning of "G8"? In masonry, "G" stands for "Generation" (sex worship) and the symbol for "Eternity" is a sideways "8" (mobius strip), so G8 means "Generation Eternal" or "Sex Worship Eternal". The background of all the Huntsville speeches was covered in G8 "wallpaper". "G" can also refer to the "G-Spot", "Gnosis" (occult knowledge), and "Geometry" (they call sex "sacred geometry").
The number 8 is the sun worshippers' number. 8 symbolized "the universe" in Babylon. 8 is also a hidden 666 (because 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8=36 and 1+2+...+35+36=666). The 8th scarlet king in the Book of Revelation in the Bible is the anti-Christ. In the alphabet H=8, and H+=transhumanism (using technology to create human/robot "gods").
G can refer to Globalism (the new "one world" order), as in G8, G20, G30 (Rockefeller) and G192 (the United Nations). Also notice that in numerology G=7, so G192=7+1+9+2=19=1+9=10, the "Number of Law".
Gatorade's new symbol is a giant "G" with a lightning bolt. Once again, the "G" is "Generation", or "Sex Worship", and the lightning bolt is lucifer/satan, who fell from heaven like lightning in the Bible. According to masonic leader Albert Pike in Morals and Dogma, "lucifer is god".
Stephen Harper seemed to have difficulty saying the word "Canada". He instead hesitated, and then referred to it as "Our part of North America". The elimination of the word "Canada" to prepare us for the North American Union has begun. No wonder the "Dominion" supermarket was renamed "Metro" a few years ago: They want us to forget the Dominion of Canada.
Why did the police "kettle" and arrest innocent Toronto citizens who had broken no law, while the Black Bloc thugs wreaked havoc unabated? I don't blame the police, I blame whoever was "calling the shots" and the Black Bloc.
Police officers have gone on record saying they were "ordered not to interfere" (Toronto Sun, June 30, 2010): "...(the police) could have rounded up all...of (the anarchists) in no time. The only thing that stopped the officers from doing that was an order telling them not to". An order from whom? Bill Blair? David Miller? Dalton McGuinty? Stephen Harper? Someone else? I have no idea.
CSIS chief Richard Fadden says that some municipal, provincial, and federal politicians are "under the general influence of a foreign government". Is it foreign influence that made Toronto's G20 a human rights disaster?
Of course, the treasonous Canadian politicians involved now want Fadden to step down. Why should he step down for doing his job properly? How did he "cast aspersions on...hundreds of elected officials", as Mark Holland alleges, when the number involved has not even been made public? He didn't. The guilty are guilty and the innocent are innocent. Kudos to Stephen Harper for supporting Fadden's efforts as well.
It is wonderful that we appear to have a trustworthy "good guy" running CSIS, but if the politicians involved are guilty of treason, then why haven't they been arrested? If they are innocent, then why mention it at all?
The Black Bloc were already acting suspiciously back in May, if you recall. The corporate-controlled news media repeatedly reported that the Black Bloc anarchists were headed to the G20 to vandalize and riot.
Black Bloc members videotaped themselves firebombing a Royal Bank of Canada in Ottawa on May 18. How many criminal organizations do you know that are eager to provide the media evidence to help incriminate themselves? This was the reason (or excuse) to increase the G8/G20 budget from 150 million to about 1.2 billion (officially).
How many underground criminal movements proudly boast of their plans a month ahead of time? Couldn't they have been tracked down and arrested in May? And why did the corporate-controlled media report their threat repeatedly for weeks?
The news usually changes every day, yet they repeated this same story over and over, apparently to discourage peaceful protesters from attending, and to justify the ridiculously high cost of security for the G20, two to four times the cost of all previous G20 meetings.
This same "violent protesters are coming" media scare tactic was used in Miami in 2003 for the FTAA and in Pittsburgh in 2009 for their G20.
The corporate-controlled media also frequently reported about the police finding weapons in car trunks. Most of the weapons sounded like typical things one could find in any car trunk i.e. extra gasoline, bicycle helmets, golf balls, etc., although some items were definitely cause for concern, such as a chainsaw and a crossbow...except that Blair later admitted they were not really related to the G20.
Bill Blair and Dalton McGuinty have subsequently admitted they lied about the "five metre arrest" law for the perimeter fence. Is it appropriate for them to conceal new laws and to lie about laws that don't exist, so citizens cannot possibly follow the rules unless they are clairvoyant? What else are they lying about? Why were citizens arrested for breaking a law that didn't exist? Why does the Executive Council of Ontario have the power to create arbitrary new regulations without the public's knowledge?
On the cover of the Toronto Sun (around June 30th), Bill Blair was shown smirking. He had what appeared to be an upside-down cross on his jacket. See it for yourself if you don't believe me.
Were rain clouds seeded to rain on the protestors' parade on the 26th? Not as far-fetched as it sounds.
Is it possible the Black Bloc were really "agents provocateurs", hired to attempt to incite peaceful protesters and to justify the ridiculously high security costs of the G20? Many YouTubers believe so.
Sid Ryan was criticized for suggesting that the Black Bloc was a set-up. Yet there are indications on YouTube that the G20 riots could have been a false flag psy-op, where the "good guys" and the "bad guys" are actually on the same team. Hopefully not, yet that would certainly explain the Black Bloc's apparent "immunity to arrest".
This had precedence on a smaller scale in Montebello, Quebec in 2007, when three Black Bloc protesters were revealed to be undercover police officers:
It seems puzzling to me that the Black Bloc, which were practically wearing neon signs saying "Arrest Me", were not surrounded at Queen & University, but allowed to vandalize three "sitting duck" police cars near King & Bay, and a fourth burning police car near Queen & Spadina, for extended periods of time while cameras rolled. The police were filming the thugs destroy police property but did not interfere. I am not blaming the police, I am blaming whoever was "calling the shots" for them to stand down, and the Black Bloc.
Here is some information I have not seen reported anywhere else: On Saturday, June 26th, at Queen & Spadina, at approximately 5 pm, a row of riot police were blocking off Queen Street east of Spadina (not north or west) and Spadina Avenue south of Richmond. From south of Queen Street, a casually dressed man (not in black) walked up behind a large group of protesters, carrying a huge parcel wrapped in a white sheet. The parcel was about four feet long and one foot wide. The protesters all began to murmur "What's that guy doing? How did he get here with that big bundle?"
He dropped the bundle on the ground and opened it up. Inside were wooden poles with black flags on them, the same style that had been used by the black bloc in the window-breaking riot on Yonge Street at about 2 pm. The man with the poles then walked away, down a narrow alley (Lot Street Lane) where some police were present, and returned to Spadina Avenue about five minutes later. He then mingled with the crowd and was forgotten. For at least fifteen minutes, no protesters touched the poles in the middle of the street but they stepped over them. I'm sure they were eventually taken. What was the purpose of these poles placed in the middle of the street? To falsely increase the Black Bloc presence? To incite window breaking? And who sent this guy?
Shortly after the "stick man", the riot police went east along Queen Street, east of Spadina, leaving a police car exposed in front of Steve's Music. There was no protester pressure for them to leave the car behind. As the riot police left the car, it was attacked and set on fire, as at least two police officers calmly looked on, as can be seen on a video of the incident. Who ordered these two officers "not to get involved" in rescuing their own vehicle from a fire that was initially easy to contain?
Speaking of the "stick man", you may also recall that the symbol for fascism is "fasci", Italian for "bundles of sticks", sometimes with an axe in the middle. Fasci have been used as symbols since ancient Rome. There are fasci depicted on either side of the speaker's podium in the United States' House of Representatives. In the Capitol Dome ceiling painting (1865), the woman to the left of Washington holds a fasces.
Further down the road, at about 2 pm, more "sitting duck" police cars were attacked and set ablaze. Why would police cars be parked in the middle of King & Bay Street with no protection? What took the fire department so long to respond? Because the cameras were running and creating free anti-protester publicity? Once again, I don't blame the police, I blame whoever was "calling the shots" and preventing them from performing their duties properly.
Officers stood in close proximity to the burning cars with no apparent concern of a possible explosion. Had the fuel tanks and ammunition been removed? The three-digit police cars that were destroyed have been out of commission for many years, and all cars now have four digits. Apparently, two of the cars were reported stolen by Metro mere hours before they somehow reappeared in the middle of Queen and King streets.
One broken police car was number 766. That's one digit away from 666. Also notice that in numerology 7+6+6=19=1+9=10, the "Number of Law".
Two burning police cars were TAV 58 and TAV 59, as in "Tavistock", a group notorious for psychological warfare. 58 is also a hidden 13. TAV58=10, the Number of Law, in numerology. TAV59=the occult number 11 in numerology. (Satan is the 11th horn in the Bible. The church of satan has 11 commandments. Aquarius is 11th sign of the zodiac. 9/11.). The burning car on Queen Street West, and beamed around the world, was TAV 65, or "Tavistock 65". 65 is a hidden 11. "Tav" is also the 22nd and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. 22+11=33 (33 degrees in masonry).
Ad banners at King & Bay, and throughout the financial district, had masonic black and white checkers on them, symbolizing the pagan Temple of Solomon.
A Hazard Materials Fire Truck that responded was HAZ332. That's one digit away from the 322 of Skull & Bones. 2 x 3=6, and three sixes=666. Notice the hidden 33, 23, and "8" ("H"). Other emergency vehicles that responded were P324 (hidden 23, two digits from 322) and TFS 5331 (hidden 33, hidden 13, and numerological hidden "10", the Number of Law. Also, removing one digit from second 3 and adding it to the 1=322). Other responding pumpers were pumper 334 (hidden 33, hidden 10) and pumper 232 (hidden 322, hidden 23). Pumpers DC 31 and 32 (as in Washington, DC) were also involved. 31 is a hidden 13 and 32 is a hidden 23. DC 31=11 in numerology.
The businesses located at King & Bay where the three police cars were "sacrificed" are very telling. Located there are the Bank of Montreal, TD Canada Trust, Scotiabank, the CIBC, AGF Trust, First Canadian Place, CJMT TV, the Toronto Board of Trade, and the Consulate of Mexico.
Notice that the words "Toronto", "Montreal", "Canada", and "Canadian" have been eliminated from all our big banks for the coming North American Union. Only the word "Scotia", with its Scottish masonic roots, has not been eliminated.
Carefully included in footage of burning police cars at King & Bay was graffiti on a bank reading "bomb the banks" and, across the road "bomb da banks". On the Bank of Montreal was "A(narchy)" and "f--- the banks". Next to that read "people over profit". Spraypainted in red on the sidewalk was "class war all around", exactly what the new world order wants. On an ad with a pentagon-covered blue soccer ball was "power for people" and "f--- corp. greed". BMO also had "culture of death" on it. On the Scotiabank was "make the rich pay". On a police car hood was "f--- security culture". Protesters (or fake protesters) with red bandannas waved flags in communist red.
The CCTV cameras were working overtime recording everyone and everything at that intersection, of course. Handy for gathering biometric information.
What psychological effect did it have on police officers who were forced to stand and watch their police vehicles attacked and set on fire a few metres away from them, while being ordered by their superior not to interfere?
The burning police car near Queen & John was clearly marked "bait" in green on the side, right under the 911 logo (9/11). The number of the car was 3251, a hidden "11". The other side was spray painted "Police State" in red.
Police officers across the street looked on but made no attempt to put out the initial tiny fire or arrest the firestarter. The burning car was "coincidentally" located near CTV News. I wonder if they reported it? The fire department appeared to be in no hurry to respond either, if they were even told about it. Who gave the orders to do nothing on this one?
That wasn't just a car going up in flames, it was our freedom going up in flames, a "ritual sacrifice", if you will.
All the police cars and store windows were, of course, insured, so very little was lost financially from their destruction, if anything, except for the insurers, of course, and loss of business for the stores affected. The real cost was to our civil liberties.
How did the police department somehow neglect to protect Yonge Street, the primary thoroughfare of all of Canada? Was the billion dollar security budget, with a reported 20,000 officers, not enough to protect Yonge Street from a small group of thugs? Once again, some mysterious leader apparently ordered the police to not stop the rioters.
When asked why the police did not confront the Black Bloc as they vandalized Yonge Street, one officer responded "We were filming them". That is great for the six o'clock news, but it does not protect the people or property of Toronto.
Is it not suspicious that the Black Bloc then proceeded up Yonge Street breaking windows without any police in sight, to attack Police Headquarters, where they still were not arrested? Yes, the Black Bloc trail of destruction led directly to, and ended at, Toronto Police Headquarters. This screams "false flag".
Is this common procedure, for Police Headquarters to be attacked by thugs and for the police to not respond? I don't blame the police, I blame whoever was "calling the shots", who obviously ordered them not to move, and the Black Bloc.
The Black Bloc was then, for reasons unknown, and despite a strong police presence in front of Police Headquarters, allowed to continue west to Queen's Park, in full Black Bloc regalia (black hoodie, pants, face scarf, sunglasses, and rocks).
Not a single window was broken on Yonge Street north of College, suggesting the Black Bloc's pre-determined destination was attacking Police Headquarters and then continuing west to Queen's Park.
Why did the police wait for the Black Bloc to take off their "neon sign" type uniforms and assimilate at Queen's Park? Half an hour later, the police attacked the peaceful protesters at Queen's Park with tear gas. A man in Black Bloc regalia can be seen running through police lines to be protected by them on YouTube. I don't blame the cops, I blame whoever "called the shots" and the Black Bloc.
Why were certain protesters, some of whom were dressed in black, welcomed across police barriers, while others were threatened not to come near them? Obviously, many "protesters" at Queen's Park were really undercover cops.
Bill Blair essentially accused the peaceful protesters of collusion, despite the fact that the Black Bloc thugs threatened and attacked the peaceful protesters. How are unarmed protesters supposed to stop a marauding band of thugs? He has some nerve accusing unarmed peaceful protesters of not doing enough to stop the Black Bloc when his own heavily armed riot squads seemed powerless to stop them.
Bill Blair has done many wonderful things for Toronto in the past, for example he handled the Jane Creba murder case masterfully, but when the peaceful citizens whom Blair swore "to serve and protect" become some kind of "enemy" who are "guilty until proven innocent" and herded like cattle to prison camps, there's something seriously wrong.
On Saturday night, about 100 peaceful protesters were boxed in and arrested on the Esplanade. Was this done for the benefit of the low-level G20 officials staying at the Novotel there?
On Sunday, June 27th, a large group of peaceful protesters had been forced by roadblocks all the way from King & Bay to end up at Queen & Spadina. At Queen and Spadina, riot police "kettled" the peaceful protesters, and others just walking down the street, for four hours in the rain. This included members of the media with legitimate media passes. Is this surrounding technique called "kettling" because they hope to provoke the crowd into "losing their steam" and justify mass arrests?
Many riot police, emboldened behind the anonymity of their large numbers, their masks, and their covered up badge numbers, engaged in police brutality and excessive force with no fear of being reprimanded, like stormtroopers. And, to their credit, many did not.
Police relations with the public has been set back twenty years in two days, which, of course, was part of the new world order plan. The police are being manipulated as much as we are. Let us hope they will not follow orders that are in direct contravention of our Constitution.
This event is covered in familiar fingerprints. After all, whose motto is it to create "Order out of Chaos" ("Ordo ab Chao")?
Speaking of "Ordo Ab Chao", has anyone noticed that Metro Police Headquarters on College Street looks like a masonic temple? Serving a secret society is a conflict of interest for those who are hired to serve and protect the public.
On the northwest corner is a statue of an innocent little boy pulling a giant phallic obelisk on a little red wagon. Inappropriate decor for a police station to put it mildly. Who erected this thing one block away from Grosvenor Street, Toronto's "boy's town" district? The obelisk consists of three trapezoids and a pyramid capstone.
In front of the main entrance is a woman laying the cornerstone of an uncapped pyramid. Both the cornerstone and the uncapped pyramid are masonic (refer to the back of a US dollar bill).
There is a third statue nearby, with a bald mason carrying two granite blocks and two books on his primitive mortarboards. In the Bible, disciples of Ba'al shaved their heads bald. In Babylon, disciples of Ba'al (Nimrod) also worshipped phallic obelisks.
The entrance of police headquarters has granite pillars with a pyramid above the door. The windows of the entrance seem to spell O.T.O. (or Ordo Templi Orientis, a satanic secret society that included Aleister Crowley).
The crest over the door is also rife with symbolism:
I personally chatted with friendly officers who understand how to treat the public with respect. Yet "something is rotten in Toronto".
I also noticed that Queen's Park has a horizontal monolith, ostensibly dedicated to the men and women who sacrificed their lives in war to protect Canada's freedom.
Unfortunately, trapezoidal black granite monoliths are really shrines to lucifer/satan, which begs the question: Why is there a tax-funded shrine to lucifer on the lawn of the Ontario Legislature, and why does nobody seem to notice or care?
Are our war heroes really "honoured" by this shrine to lucifer, or is their memory, in fact, desecrated by it? Most of our veteran war heroes were, and are, Christians, not luciferians.
Other luciferian monoliths can be found at the grave of Lord Baden-Powell (founder of the Boy Scouts), the Washington Vietnam Memorial (next to the giant obelisk known as the Washington Monument), the United Nations Meditation Room, the Arrow Air Flight 1285 Memorial in Fort Campbell, Kentucky (suspicious Contra scandal plane crash in Gander, Nfld.), in the masonic movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" by Stanley Kubrick, and on the cover of Led Zeppelin "Presence". The black monolith symbolizes the occult mysticism of lucifer. The Kaaba at Mecca is also a big black rock.
Exactly how was this "police state", in which our own taxes are used to finance riot police to arrest us without charge, and hold us indefinitely without access to a lawyer, advantageous to Torontonians? It wasn't.
Exactly how was this rampage of imported Black Bloc thugs damaging private businesses, resulting in many lost business days and profits, advantageous to Toronto business and tourism? It wasn't.
Exactly how was this public relations nightmare of being ordered to attack peaceful citizens advantageous to Toronto police officers? It wasn't.
Who funds the Black Bloc, which flew over to Vancouver for the Winter Olympics, and then back to Toronto for the G20? Not to mention their appearance down in Denver, Colorado? Do these alleged "street people" have unlimited funds?
Why do most of the Black Bloc's boots look the same in the G20 videos? Why were most of their clothes brand new and not worn or faded? Why were their physiques mostly big and tall and well-toned? Why were their window-breaking batons almost exactly the same as the riot police batons? Why did most of them cover their lower backs? Were they concealing guns? Why were apparently none arrested or named? And why can't they spell simple words like "riot"? Are they instructed to misspell words?
Why were so many peaceful protesters arrested without charge and subsequently released? Was there a quota in place?
Does arresting peaceful people en masse because there "might be black bloc members present" remind anyone of the "War on Terror" and the perpetual pursuit of an invisible (non-existent) enemy?
If the police and citizens of Toronto did not benefit from the G20, then who did? The G20 served many new world order purposes: To make the police angry at the very citizens they took an oath to "serve and protect", to make the peaceful protesters angry with the police who were "just following orders", to militarize Toronto, to accustom us to violence, hooliganism, and brutality, to make corporations appear to be "helpless victims", to turn peaceful protesters somehow into "the bad guys", to divert attention from the real issues of the G20 to footage of a burning police car, to create fear, to photograph thousands of peaceful protesters, to install more CCTV cameras, to dissuade peaceful protesters from voicing their concerns in the future, to test out the new FEMA-style camp, and the list goes on and on.
Hollywood, no longer content to just bombard us with perverted filth year after year, is now providing incarceration facilities for the new world order as well. The Hollywood-connected FEMA-style camp on Eastern Avenue, nicknamed "Torontonomo Bay" by the prisoners, had masonic black and white checkered tiles on the floor.
Female detainees, some apparently as young as fifteen, reported being strip-searched and probed by male officers, and being repeatedly threatened with rape.
Peaceful protesters were fired on with rubber bullets at close range, as shown on YouTube.
Other peaceful protesters were attacked for no apparent reason while singing "O Canada", also on YouTube.
A girl was arrested by a cop for endangering him with soap bubbles. It's on YouTube under "Officer Bubbles". On his Facebook page, he listed his profession as "collecting human garbage".
Update: It turns out that Officer Bubbles and many other officers earned over a hundred thousand dollars in 2010, due primarily to overtime pay from the G20. And who paid for that overtime? Citizens like the soap bubble girl, of course.
John Pruyn, a 57-year-old amputee with a prosthesis, was sitting peacefully with his daughter at Queen's Park. When he was ordered to move, he moved slowly due to his leg. He says he was then kicked, punched, and arrested, his artificial leg was removed by riot police, and he was ordered to "hop". He was detained in jail for more than a day with his hands bound. When he asked for his leg back, they said it was a "weapon". Not the Metro police's finest moment, to put it mildly.
Too many questions and not enough answers.
YouTubers seem to think that the Black Bloc were undercover police officers. It seems possible, but who knows? I hope not.
Also notice that our G20 fiasco is being covered extensively by Russia Today, to illustrate to them what a pathetic police state we are living in here.
I look forward to removing any inaccurate information I have accidentally included here.
No, I am not anti-cop, I am pro-cop. I am also anti Black Bloc and anti-corruption. Like I said, the vast majority of Toronto police are great.
I haven't even discussed G20 policies yet. We have been distracted from the real issues once again. Of course, their press conferences had nothing to do with what they discussed. They discussed the North American Union and probably, when Stephen Harper was not in the room, how to bankrupt Canada.
Do you recall what CTV reported the G20 would cost us on February 24th? They said it would cost $150 million, with $143 million paid by the federal government and $7 million paid by Toronto (because it's so beneficial to us). $130 million of that amount was earmarked for security. That was before certain unscrupulous parties figured that this open trough of money should be taken advantage of more thoroughly, ten times more thoroughly to be exact.
I guess a cynic would say that importing those agitators and paying them overtime really adds up these days.
Why wasn't the meeting held at Exhibition Place, which is already fenced in and far from businesses? The "Fake Lake" was located there. There is also a masonic shrine fountain located there, and about thirty pagan god statues to make them feel at home. The fountain features a dark angel on top of the globe, holding aloft laurel leaves, symbolizing the victory of the goddess over the world.
Why wasn't the G20 meeting held at a secure military base with runways, like Trenton? Why didn't they just have a teleconference for free? And why are these accursed meetings held so frequently in Ontario?
Stephen Harper certainly got "revenge" on Toronto voters for not being supportive to his government, if that was his intention.
Since when did peaceful protest, peaceful assembly, free speech, and walking down the street in Toronto become illegal? And since when did arresting citizens without formal charges, who have broken no law, are given no legal council, and are incarcerated indefinitely become legal in Toronto? Since never.
But I guess there's no point in spending over a billion dollars on security and building a FEMA camp without filling it up, is there? The theme of the summit was "Recovery and New Beginnings" (sounds like a euphemism for the "new world order").
G20 riot police, King & Bay, Saturday June 25, 2010.
Copyright 2010.
The "Fake Lake" turned out to be a $57,000 movie screen of Muskoka, with a few chairs, a few canoes, and a masonic reflecting pool in front of it, in a "T" shape (T-square, Tau cross). For that price, they could have rented ten buses to Muskoka and let the reporters experience it firsthand.
The Tau cross symbolizes the worship of the Sumerian solar god Tammuz, the Egyptian mysteries, blood sacrifice, and the zodiac bull Taurus (Zeus, moloch, Wall Street, commerce).
What publicity did we get in return for our 23 million dollar G8/G20 International Media Centre? Well, a New York Times article did mention the "natural beauty of the Muskoka region". Then again, a Reuters reporter condemned the "fake lake". I guess nothing says "Canadian fiscal restraint" to the world like a 23 million dollar boondoggle. Notice the occult number 23.
Mark Holland remarked that "Instead of hosting world leaders, maybe the government should consider party planning for Lady Gaga".
Here is Stephen Harper at the G20 declaring that "there isn't really a Canadian economy anymore, only a global economy", in other words, "there isn't really a Canada anymore, only a new world order". He then laughs as he talks about Canada's "loss of national sovereignty":
Like Stephen Harper, and the masonic occult group Rush, says: "Each must play his part" (in the new world order).
Yes, we paid the G20 over a billion dollars to come to Toronto and plan how to destroy Canada. More money well-spent by the Harper government.
Hosting the G20 guests at the Metro Convention Centre did allow the guests to be near one of the tallest phallic obelisks in the world, that shrine to Ba'al/lucifer known as the CN Tower. After all, that is allegedly who most of the bigwigs worship and attain their power from.
It is right next to the female-anatomy structure, the former Skydome, which opens and closes. They copied the male Trylon (triangular pylon) and female Perisphere (surrounding sphere) of Edward Bernays' 1939 New York World's Fair.
What do obelisks have to do with politics and religion? There is a reason why the Washington Monument obelisk is right in front of the White House, folks. Read the book "Oval Office Occult" by Brian M. Thomsen if you don't know why. There is a reason that there is an Egyptian obelisk in the courtyard of the Vatican.
By the way, did anyone else notice the hidden meaning of "G8"? In masonry, "G" stands for "Generation" (sex worship) and the symbol for "Eternity" is a sideways "8" (mobius strip), so G8 means "Generation Eternal" or "Sex Worship Eternal". The background of all the Huntsville speeches was covered in G8 "wallpaper". "G" can also refer to the "G-Spot", "Gnosis" (occult knowledge), and "Geometry" (they call sex "sacred geometry").
The number 8 is the sun worshippers' number. 8 symbolized "the universe" in Babylon. 8 is also a hidden 666 (because 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8=36 and 1+2+...+35+36=666). The 8th scarlet king in the Book of Revelation in the Bible is the anti-Christ. In the alphabet H=8, and H+=transhumanism (using technology to create human/robot "gods").
G can refer to Globalism (the new "one world" order), as in G8, G20, G30 (Rockefeller) and G192 (the United Nations). Also notice that in numerology G=7, so G192=7+1+9+2=19=1+9=10, the "Number of Law".
Gatorade's new symbol is a giant "G" with a lightning bolt. Once again, the "G" is "Generation", or "Sex Worship", and the lightning bolt is lucifer/satan, who fell from heaven like lightning in the Bible. According to masonic leader Albert Pike in Morals and Dogma, "lucifer is god".
G=Generation=Sex Worship.
Lightning=lucifer/satan.
Stephen Harper seemed to have difficulty saying the word "Canada". He instead hesitated, and then referred to it as "Our part of North America". The elimination of the word "Canada" to prepare us for the North American Union has begun. No wonder the "Dominion" supermarket was renamed "Metro" a few years ago: They want us to forget the Dominion of Canada.
Why did the police "kettle" and arrest innocent Toronto citizens who had broken no law, while the Black Bloc thugs wreaked havoc unabated? I don't blame the police, I blame whoever was "calling the shots" and the Black Bloc.
Police officers have gone on record saying they were "ordered not to interfere" (Toronto Sun, June 30, 2010): "...(the police) could have rounded up all...of (the anarchists) in no time. The only thing that stopped the officers from doing that was an order telling them not to". An order from whom? Bill Blair? David Miller? Dalton McGuinty? Stephen Harper? Someone else? I have no idea.
CSIS chief Richard Fadden says that some municipal, provincial, and federal politicians are "under the general influence of a foreign government". Is it foreign influence that made Toronto's G20 a human rights disaster?
Of course, the treasonous Canadian politicians involved now want Fadden to step down. Why should he step down for doing his job properly? How did he "cast aspersions on...hundreds of elected officials", as Mark Holland alleges, when the number involved has not even been made public? He didn't. The guilty are guilty and the innocent are innocent. Kudos to Stephen Harper for supporting Fadden's efforts as well.
It is wonderful that we appear to have a trustworthy "good guy" running CSIS, but if the politicians involved are guilty of treason, then why haven't they been arrested? If they are innocent, then why mention it at all?
Hidden riot police await to "kettle" protesters at Yonge & Richmond on Saturday c.4 pm.
The Black Bloc was long gone, up Yonge Street, at this time.
The Black Bloc were already acting suspiciously back in May, if you recall. The corporate-controlled news media repeatedly reported that the Black Bloc anarchists were headed to the G20 to vandalize and riot.
Black Bloc members videotaped themselves firebombing a Royal Bank of Canada in Ottawa on May 18. How many criminal organizations do you know that are eager to provide the media evidence to help incriminate themselves? This was the reason (or excuse) to increase the G8/G20 budget from 150 million to about 1.2 billion (officially).
How many underground criminal movements proudly boast of their plans a month ahead of time? Couldn't they have been tracked down and arrested in May? And why did the corporate-controlled media report their threat repeatedly for weeks?
The news usually changes every day, yet they repeated this same story over and over, apparently to discourage peaceful protesters from attending, and to justify the ridiculously high cost of security for the G20, two to four times the cost of all previous G20 meetings.
This same "violent protesters are coming" media scare tactic was used in Miami in 2003 for the FTAA and in Pittsburgh in 2009 for their G20.
The corporate-controlled media also frequently reported about the police finding weapons in car trunks. Most of the weapons sounded like typical things one could find in any car trunk i.e. extra gasoline, bicycle helmets, golf balls, etc., although some items were definitely cause for concern, such as a chainsaw and a crossbow...except that Blair later admitted they were not really related to the G20.
Bill Blair and Dalton McGuinty have subsequently admitted they lied about the "five metre arrest" law for the perimeter fence. Is it appropriate for them to conceal new laws and to lie about laws that don't exist, so citizens cannot possibly follow the rules unless they are clairvoyant? What else are they lying about? Why were citizens arrested for breaking a law that didn't exist? Why does the Executive Council of Ontario have the power to create arbitrary new regulations without the public's knowledge?
On the cover of the Toronto Sun (around June 30th), Bill Blair was shown smirking. He had what appeared to be an upside-down cross on his jacket. See it for yourself if you don't believe me.
Were rain clouds seeded to rain on the protestors' parade on the 26th? Not as far-fetched as it sounds.
Is it possible the Black Bloc were really "agents provocateurs", hired to attempt to incite peaceful protesters and to justify the ridiculously high security costs of the G20? Many YouTubers believe so.
Sid Ryan was criticized for suggesting that the Black Bloc was a set-up. Yet there are indications on YouTube that the G20 riots could have been a false flag psy-op, where the "good guys" and the "bad guys" are actually on the same team. Hopefully not, yet that would certainly explain the Black Bloc's apparent "immunity to arrest".
This had precedence on a smaller scale in Montebello, Quebec in 2007, when three Black Bloc protesters were revealed to be undercover police officers:
It seems puzzling to me that the Black Bloc, which were practically wearing neon signs saying "Arrest Me", were not surrounded at Queen & University, but allowed to vandalize three "sitting duck" police cars near King & Bay, and a fourth burning police car near Queen & Spadina, for extended periods of time while cameras rolled. The police were filming the thugs destroy police property but did not interfere. I am not blaming the police, I am blaming whoever was "calling the shots" for them to stand down, and the Black Bloc.
The identically uniformed black bloc members surround themselves with identical black banners.
Random and disorganized? Difficult to spot? Difficult to arrest?
Here is some information I have not seen reported anywhere else: On Saturday, June 26th, at Queen & Spadina, at approximately 5 pm, a row of riot police were blocking off Queen Street east of Spadina (not north or west) and Spadina Avenue south of Richmond. From south of Queen Street, a casually dressed man (not in black) walked up behind a large group of protesters, carrying a huge parcel wrapped in a white sheet. The parcel was about four feet long and one foot wide. The protesters all began to murmur "What's that guy doing? How did he get here with that big bundle?"
He dropped the bundle on the ground and opened it up. Inside were wooden poles with black flags on them, the same style that had been used by the black bloc in the window-breaking riot on Yonge Street at about 2 pm. The man with the poles then walked away, down a narrow alley (Lot Street Lane) where some police were present, and returned to Spadina Avenue about five minutes later. He then mingled with the crowd and was forgotten. For at least fifteen minutes, no protesters touched the poles in the middle of the street but they stepped over them. I'm sure they were eventually taken. What was the purpose of these poles placed in the middle of the street? To falsely increase the Black Bloc presence? To incite window breaking? And who sent this guy?
Shortly after the "stick man", the riot police went east along Queen Street, east of Spadina, leaving a police car exposed in front of Steve's Music. There was no protester pressure for them to leave the car behind. As the riot police left the car, it was attacked and set on fire, as at least two police officers calmly looked on, as can be seen on a video of the incident. Who ordered these two officers "not to get involved" in rescuing their own vehicle from a fire that was initially easy to contain?
Speaking of the "stick man", you may also recall that the symbol for fascism is "fasci", Italian for "bundles of sticks", sometimes with an axe in the middle. Fasci have been used as symbols since ancient Rome. There are fasci depicted on either side of the speaker's podium in the United States' House of Representatives. In the Capitol Dome ceiling painting (1865), the woman to the left of Washington holds a fasces.
JFK in the United States' House Chamber.
A fasces is seen to the right.
Further down the road, at about 2 pm, more "sitting duck" police cars were attacked and set ablaze. Why would police cars be parked in the middle of King & Bay Street with no protection? What took the fire department so long to respond? Because the cameras were running and creating free anti-protester publicity? Once again, I don't blame the police, I blame whoever was "calling the shots" and preventing them from performing their duties properly.
Officers stood in close proximity to the burning cars with no apparent concern of a possible explosion. Had the fuel tanks and ammunition been removed? The three-digit police cars that were destroyed have been out of commission for many years, and all cars now have four digits. Apparently, two of the cars were reported stolen by Metro mere hours before they somehow reappeared in the middle of Queen and King streets.
One broken police car was number 766. That's one digit away from 666. Also notice that in numerology 7+6+6=19=1+9=10, the "Number of Law".
Two burning police cars were TAV 58 and TAV 59, as in "Tavistock", a group notorious for psychological warfare. 58 is also a hidden 13. TAV58=10, the Number of Law, in numerology. TAV59=the occult number 11 in numerology. (Satan is the 11th horn in the Bible. The church of satan has 11 commandments. Aquarius is 11th sign of the zodiac. 9/11.). The burning car on Queen Street West, and beamed around the world, was TAV 65, or "Tavistock 65". 65 is a hidden 11. "Tav" is also the 22nd and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. 22+11=33 (33 degrees in masonry).
Ad banners at King & Bay, and throughout the financial district, had masonic black and white checkers on them, symbolizing the pagan Temple of Solomon.
A Hazard Materials Fire Truck that responded was HAZ332. That's one digit away from the 322 of Skull & Bones. 2 x 3=6, and three sixes=666. Notice the hidden 33, 23, and "8" ("H"). Other emergency vehicles that responded were P324 (hidden 23, two digits from 322) and TFS 5331 (hidden 33, hidden 13, and numerological hidden "10", the Number of Law. Also, removing one digit from second 3 and adding it to the 1=322). Other responding pumpers were pumper 334 (hidden 33, hidden 10) and pumper 232 (hidden 322, hidden 23). Pumpers DC 31 and 32 (as in Washington, DC) were also involved. 31 is a hidden 13 and 32 is a hidden 23. DC 31=11 in numerology.
The businesses located at King & Bay where the three police cars were "sacrificed" are very telling. Located there are the Bank of Montreal, TD Canada Trust, Scotiabank, the CIBC, AGF Trust, First Canadian Place, CJMT TV, the Toronto Board of Trade, and the Consulate of Mexico.
Notice that the words "Toronto", "Montreal", "Canada", and "Canadian" have been eliminated from all our big banks for the coming North American Union. Only the word "Scotia", with its Scottish masonic roots, has not been eliminated.
Carefully included in footage of burning police cars at King & Bay was graffiti on a bank reading "bomb the banks" and, across the road "bomb da banks". On the Bank of Montreal was "A(narchy)" and "f--- the banks". Next to that read "people over profit". Spraypainted in red on the sidewalk was "class war all around", exactly what the new world order wants. On an ad with a pentagon-covered blue soccer ball was "power for people" and "f--- corp. greed". BMO also had "culture of death" on it. On the Scotiabank was "make the rich pay". On a police car hood was "f--- security culture". Protesters (or fake protesters) with red bandannas waved flags in communist red.
The CCTV cameras were working overtime recording everyone and everything at that intersection, of course. Handy for gathering biometric information.
What psychological effect did it have on police officers who were forced to stand and watch their police vehicles attacked and set on fire a few metres away from them, while being ordered by their superior not to interfere?
The burning police car near Queen & John was clearly marked "bait" in green on the side, right under the 911 logo (9/11). The number of the car was 3251, a hidden "11". The other side was spray painted "Police State" in red.
Police officers across the street looked on but made no attempt to put out the initial tiny fire or arrest the firestarter. The burning car was "coincidentally" located near CTV News. I wonder if they reported it? The fire department appeared to be in no hurry to respond either, if they were even told about it. Who gave the orders to do nothing on this one?
That wasn't just a car going up in flames, it was our freedom going up in flames, a "ritual sacrifice", if you will.
All the police cars and store windows were, of course, insured, so very little was lost financially from their destruction, if anything, except for the insurers, of course, and loss of business for the stores affected. The real cost was to our civil liberties.
How did the police department somehow neglect to protect Yonge Street, the primary thoroughfare of all of Canada? Was the billion dollar security budget, with a reported 20,000 officers, not enough to protect Yonge Street from a small group of thugs? Once again, some mysterious leader apparently ordered the police to not stop the rioters.
When asked why the police did not confront the Black Bloc as they vandalized Yonge Street, one officer responded "We were filming them". That is great for the six o'clock news, but it does not protect the people or property of Toronto.
Is it not suspicious that the Black Bloc then proceeded up Yonge Street breaking windows without any police in sight, to attack Police Headquarters, where they still were not arrested? Yes, the Black Bloc trail of destruction led directly to, and ended at, Toronto Police Headquarters. This screams "false flag".
Is this common procedure, for Police Headquarters to be attacked by thugs and for the police to not respond? I don't blame the police, I blame whoever was "calling the shots", who obviously ordered them not to move, and the Black Bloc.
The Black Bloc was then, for reasons unknown, and despite a strong police presence in front of Police Headquarters, allowed to continue west to Queen's Park, in full Black Bloc regalia (black hoodie, pants, face scarf, sunglasses, and rocks).
Not a single window was broken on Yonge Street north of College, suggesting the Black Bloc's pre-determined destination was attacking Police Headquarters and then continuing west to Queen's Park.
Why did the police wait for the Black Bloc to take off their "neon sign" type uniforms and assimilate at Queen's Park? Half an hour later, the police attacked the peaceful protesters at Queen's Park with tear gas. A man in Black Bloc regalia can be seen running through police lines to be protected by them on YouTube. I don't blame the cops, I blame whoever "called the shots" and the Black Bloc.
Why were certain protesters, some of whom were dressed in black, welcomed across police barriers, while others were threatened not to come near them? Obviously, many "protesters" at Queen's Park were really undercover cops.
Bill Blair essentially accused the peaceful protesters of collusion, despite the fact that the Black Bloc thugs threatened and attacked the peaceful protesters. How are unarmed protesters supposed to stop a marauding band of thugs? He has some nerve accusing unarmed peaceful protesters of not doing enough to stop the Black Bloc when his own heavily armed riot squads seemed powerless to stop them.
Bill Blair has done many wonderful things for Toronto in the past, for example he handled the Jane Creba murder case masterfully, but when the peaceful citizens whom Blair swore "to serve and protect" become some kind of "enemy" who are "guilty until proven innocent" and herded like cattle to prison camps, there's something seriously wrong.
On Saturday night, about 100 peaceful protesters were boxed in and arrested on the Esplanade. Was this done for the benefit of the low-level G20 officials staying at the Novotel there?
On Sunday, June 27th, a large group of peaceful protesters had been forced by roadblocks all the way from King & Bay to end up at Queen & Spadina. At Queen and Spadina, riot police "kettled" the peaceful protesters, and others just walking down the street, for four hours in the rain. This included members of the media with legitimate media passes. Is this surrounding technique called "kettling" because they hope to provoke the crowd into "losing their steam" and justify mass arrests?
Many riot police, emboldened behind the anonymity of their large numbers, their masks, and their covered up badge numbers, engaged in police brutality and excessive force with no fear of being reprimanded, like stormtroopers. And, to their credit, many did not.
Police relations with the public has been set back twenty years in two days, which, of course, was part of the new world order plan. The police are being manipulated as much as we are. Let us hope they will not follow orders that are in direct contravention of our Constitution.
This event is covered in familiar fingerprints. After all, whose motto is it to create "Order out of Chaos" ("Ordo ab Chao")?
Speaking of "Ordo Ab Chao", has anyone noticed that Metro Police Headquarters on College Street looks like a masonic temple? Serving a secret society is a conflict of interest for those who are hired to serve and protect the public.
On the northwest corner is a statue of an innocent little boy pulling a giant phallic obelisk on a little red wagon. Inappropriate decor for a police station to put it mildly. Who erected this thing one block away from Grosvenor Street, Toronto's "boy's town" district? The obelisk consists of three trapezoids and a pyramid capstone.
Does this young boy hauling a huge phallic obelisk seem inappropriate to you?
In front of the main entrance is a woman laying the cornerstone of an uncapped pyramid. Both the cornerstone and the uncapped pyramid are masonic (refer to the back of a US dollar bill).
Laying the cornerstone of the uncapped pyramid.
Ironically, women are not permitted to join the masons.
There is a third statue nearby, with a bald mason carrying two granite blocks and two books on his primitive mortarboards. In the Bible, disciples of Ba'al shaved their heads bald. In Babylon, disciples of Ba'al (Nimrod) also worshipped phallic obelisks.
The entrance of police headquarters has granite pillars with a pyramid above the door. The windows of the entrance seem to spell O.T.O. (or Ordo Templi Orientis, a satanic secret society that included Aleister Crowley).
Entrance to Police Headquarters seems to spell O.T.O. (photo not mine).
The crest over the door is also rife with symbolism:
Note the three discs with wings (Horus/sun worship), a rod with intertwined snakes (caduceus/Hermes/Mercury/Isis/baphomet phallus/medicine), a white "pyramid" (Egyptian mysticism), a masonic "V" in Templar red and white, the masonic "two books", and the many "circles within circles".
Crest Copyright Toronto Police.
As I say, I don't blame the police officers for the G20 fiasco, who were as confused and frustrated as the rest of us. The riot police generally showed remarkable restraint by standing motionless for hours in hot, heavy helmets, sometimes receiving verbal abuse from the passerby. I blame the Black Bloc and whoever "called the shots".I personally chatted with friendly officers who understand how to treat the public with respect. Yet "something is rotten in Toronto".
One of the many friendly police officers at the G20. Why can't they all be like this?
I also noticed that Queen's Park has a horizontal monolith, ostensibly dedicated to the men and women who sacrificed their lives in war to protect Canada's freedom.
Unfortunately, trapezoidal black granite monoliths are really shrines to lucifer/satan, which begs the question: Why is there a tax-funded shrine to lucifer on the lawn of the Ontario Legislature, and why does nobody seem to notice or care?
War Memorial or trapezoidal monolithic shrine to lucifer?
Are our war heroes really "honoured" by this shrine to lucifer, or is their memory, in fact, desecrated by it? Most of our veteran war heroes were, and are, Christians, not luciferians.
Other luciferian monoliths can be found at the grave of Lord Baden-Powell (founder of the Boy Scouts), the Washington Vietnam Memorial (next to the giant obelisk known as the Washington Monument), the United Nations Meditation Room, the Arrow Air Flight 1285 Memorial in Fort Campbell, Kentucky (suspicious Contra scandal plane crash in Gander, Nfld.), in the masonic movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" by Stanley Kubrick, and on the cover of Led Zeppelin "Presence". The black monolith symbolizes the occult mysticism of lucifer. The Kaaba at Mecca is also a big black rock.
Exactly how was this "police state", in which our own taxes are used to finance riot police to arrest us without charge, and hold us indefinitely without access to a lawyer, advantageous to Torontonians? It wasn't.
Exactly how was this rampage of imported Black Bloc thugs damaging private businesses, resulting in many lost business days and profits, advantageous to Toronto business and tourism? It wasn't.
Exactly how was this public relations nightmare of being ordered to attack peaceful citizens advantageous to Toronto police officers? It wasn't.
Who funds the Black Bloc, which flew over to Vancouver for the Winter Olympics, and then back to Toronto for the G20? Not to mention their appearance down in Denver, Colorado? Do these alleged "street people" have unlimited funds?
Why do most of the Black Bloc's boots look the same in the G20 videos? Why were most of their clothes brand new and not worn or faded? Why were their physiques mostly big and tall and well-toned? Why were their window-breaking batons almost exactly the same as the riot police batons? Why did most of them cover their lower backs? Were they concealing guns? Why were apparently none arrested or named? And why can't they spell simple words like "riot"? Are they instructed to misspell words?
Why were so many peaceful protesters arrested without charge and subsequently released? Was there a quota in place?
Does arresting peaceful people en masse because there "might be black bloc members present" remind anyone of the "War on Terror" and the perpetual pursuit of an invisible (non-existent) enemy?
"Get your roit on"? Yeah, right.
Notice that Yonge-Dundas "Square" is really an occult trapezoid.
Similarly, Times Square in New York is not actually a square.
It is two trapezoids in a long thin pyramid pointing south (where satan is said to reside in the occult).
If the police and citizens of Toronto did not benefit from the G20, then who did? The G20 served many new world order purposes: To make the police angry at the very citizens they took an oath to "serve and protect", to make the peaceful protesters angry with the police who were "just following orders", to militarize Toronto, to accustom us to violence, hooliganism, and brutality, to make corporations appear to be "helpless victims", to turn peaceful protesters somehow into "the bad guys", to divert attention from the real issues of the G20 to footage of a burning police car, to create fear, to photograph thousands of peaceful protesters, to install more CCTV cameras, to dissuade peaceful protesters from voicing their concerns in the future, to test out the new FEMA-style camp, and the list goes on and on.
Hollywood, no longer content to just bombard us with perverted filth year after year, is now providing incarceration facilities for the new world order as well. The Hollywood-connected FEMA-style camp on Eastern Avenue, nicknamed "Torontonomo Bay" by the prisoners, had masonic black and white checkered tiles on the floor.
Female detainees, some apparently as young as fifteen, reported being strip-searched and probed by male officers, and being repeatedly threatened with rape.
Peaceful protesters were fired on with rubber bullets at close range, as shown on YouTube.
Other peaceful protesters were attacked for no apparent reason while singing "O Canada", also on YouTube.
A girl was arrested by a cop for endangering him with soap bubbles. It's on YouTube under "Officer Bubbles". On his Facebook page, he listed his profession as "collecting human garbage".
Update: It turns out that Officer Bubbles and many other officers earned over a hundred thousand dollars in 2010, due primarily to overtime pay from the G20. And who paid for that overtime? Citizens like the soap bubble girl, of course.
John Pruyn, a 57-year-old amputee with a prosthesis, was sitting peacefully with his daughter at Queen's Park. When he was ordered to move, he moved slowly due to his leg. He says he was then kicked, punched, and arrested, his artificial leg was removed by riot police, and he was ordered to "hop". He was detained in jail for more than a day with his hands bound. When he asked for his leg back, they said it was a "weapon". Not the Metro police's finest moment, to put it mildly.
Too many questions and not enough answers.
G20 protester arrested, College & University, Saturday June 25.
Copyright 2010.
YouTubers seem to think that the Black Bloc were undercover police officers. It seems possible, but who knows? I hope not.
Also notice that our G20 fiasco is being covered extensively by Russia Today, to illustrate to them what a pathetic police state we are living in here.
I look forward to removing any inaccurate information I have accidentally included here.
No, I am not anti-cop, I am pro-cop. I am also anti Black Bloc and anti-corruption. Like I said, the vast majority of Toronto police are great.
I haven't even discussed G20 policies yet. We have been distracted from the real issues once again. Of course, their press conferences had nothing to do with what they discussed. They discussed the North American Union and probably, when Stephen Harper was not in the room, how to bankrupt Canada.
(It's really a photo from the middle east).
The Black Bloc should be ashamed of themselves. Of course, they're not. That's just the problem: Our sense of shame and decency are being purposely destroyed by the new world order, through immoral movies, tv shows, books, music, video games, sports, bribes, intimidation, porn, violence, trivia, consumer goods, and similar propaganda, to enable their wickedness to reign in society. Our God-given sense of right and wrong are what prevents evil from conquering good. When that is gone, there is no hope, just despair.
To those who claim that media messages have no influence on us, I say then why do advertisements on the Superbowl cost three million dollars for thirty seconds?
Huntsville got a 50 million dollar payoff for hosting the G8. Whether that money was used wisely or frivolously is debateable, since there is no paper trail.
Huntsville got a 50 million dollar payoff for hosting the G8. Whether that money was used wisely or frivolously is debateable, since there is no paper trail.
To those who stayed home and watched their "programming" on tv, shame on you, too. People don't protest the G20 because it's pleasant, they protest it because it is important to protect our freedom from corporate fascism. Anyone who "doesn't want to get involved" doesn't deserve to keep the freedom they presently enjoy.
Who were the police ordered to "serve and protect" for the G20? Torontonians or totalitarianism? And who is the traitor to Canada who ordered them to act unconstitutionally? If an order is treasonous, it should not be followed. Canada's sovereignty is at stake, and our future.
It saddens me to witness Canada's transformation from freedom to fascism. The police have always been "the good guys". That is their job, and their honour. That is what we pay them for.
If we put up with civil rights abuses, can Martial Law be far behind?
Hey, new world order, when you used Toronto as a toilet, you forgot to flush.
This video is dedicated to those who thought that protesting is "a waste of time" and "don't want to get involved":
These are some of the observations of a awyer, a long time civil rights activist, street protester and University law lecturer:
"Those people in Toronto were falsely imprisoned - they were not even legally arrested. They were held in cages, like animals, in cruel hand restraints, without water, food, sanitation, medication, heating or outside communication for up to 24 hours. Needless to say, they were not charged with any offense; obviously, as they were not even legally arrested. Many of the people falsely imprisoned were not even involved in the demonstrations. And many of those carrying out the false imprisonment, and denial of basic human rights, were clearly doing so reluctantly and under orders."
It's time to start arresting the ones who broke the law, instead of the ones who didn't.
I also have blogs on the G20 "No Free Speech Zone", the G20 earthquake, and G20 protestor causes.
Here is an excellent video about the G20 in Toronto:
The good cops of the movie "Courageous":
0 comments:
Post a Comment